I already argue previously that if "morality" is argued as "God's will," that means all things that already happened is moral.
Now, let's take one step further about one thing that I am pretty sure that everybody think as immoral: INCEST. No that is still not clear enough. FORCING PEOPLE TO DO INCEST! Yeah, I am sure everyone agree that is morally wrong.
Here is the problem with the Bible regarding incest: if we take the Bible for granted, that means God at least forced every single ancestors of ours to commit it ... TWICE!
1) Hey, how do you think Adam and Eve populated earth? With whom do you think they and their descendants copulated?
2) But that is not enough, NO! God wiped out the whole earth's population with the great flood and finally asked not only the homo sapiens, but also the entire freakin earth to repopulate it using incest!
Now, what do you think about a king who ordered a couple to populate an area with incest? Hmm? Nice king? Just king? Wise king? Yeah right ...
That's why my favorite counter argument for a holier-than-thou-religious argument "Religion makes you moral! Without religion, there is no moral!" Just give them a big laugh, than pointed that their God actually think incest is an excellent method to populate earth! TWICE! That drives them mad as hell, and you can have a schadenfreude by watching them crumble inside-out!
I am sure finally they have to admit that "God has different moral standard." Basically, that means they already agree that forcing people to do incest is disgusting, but they still want to defend their imaginary friend. Like I said before, I agree that God has different standard. His standard is FAR HIGHER than ours. Hey, He is the one who His follower described as "infallible" and "omni-benevolent," He ought to live up to that label! And yeah, by the way, after saying "Different moral standard," you still want to argue that "without religion, there is no moral"? What next, you want to argue that God loves us so much that He slaughtered millions to prove that? Oh wait ... you already did that too. Silly me ...
I am sure finally they have to admit that "God has different moral standard." Basically, that means they already agree that forcing people to do incest is disgusting, but they still want to defend their imaginary friend. Like I said before, I agree that God has different standard. His standard is FAR HIGHER than ours. Hey, He is the one who His follower described as "infallible" and "omni-benevolent," He ought to live up to that label! And yeah, by the way, after saying "Different moral standard," you still want to argue that "without religion, there is no moral"? What next, you want to argue that God loves us so much that He slaughtered millions to prove that? Oh wait ... you already did that too. Silly me ...
Bonus: Here is a very good Youtube Video which explain why the Great flood is one big baloney. It already touched the incest argument near its end:
No comments:
Post a Comment